Killing Whales and Never Having to Say You’re Sorry!
David Wojick, PhD
Journalist and Independent Policy Analyst
[Editor’s Note: Green energy scams are resulting in the Federal government directly allowing something — killing whales — that it would never tolerate under any other circumstance.]
The recent deaths of seven whales off New Jersey, mostly humpbacks, got a lot of attention. The federal NOAA Fisheries agency is responsible for whales. An outrageous statement by their spokesperson got me to do some research on humpback whale deaths.
The results are appalling. The evidence seems clear that offshore wind development is killing whales by the hundreds.
Here is the statement as reported in the press:
“NOAA said it has been studying what it calls ‘unusual mortality events’ involving 174 humpback whales along the East Coast since January 2016. Agency spokesperson Lauren Gaches said that period pre-dates offshore wind preparation activities in the region.”
Gaches is NOAA Fisheries press chief.
The “unusual mortality” data is astounding. Basically the humpback death rate roughly tripled starting in 2016 and continued high thereafter. You can see it here.
But the claim that this huge jump in mortality predates offshore wind preparation activities is wildly false. In fact it coincides with the large scale onset of these activities. This strong correlation is strong evidence of causation, especially since no other possible cause has appeared.
To begin with, offshore lease sales really geared up 2015-16, with nine big sales off New Jersey, New York, Delaware and Massachusetts. These sales must have generated a lot of activity, likely including potentially damaging sonar.
In fact 2016 also saw the beginning of what are called geotechnical and site characterization surveys. These surveys are actually licensed by NOAA Fisheries, under what are called Incidental Harassment Authorizations or IHA’s.
There is some seriously misleading jargon here. IHA’s are incidental to some other activity, in this case offshore wind development. They are not incidental to the whales. In fact the term “harassment” specifically includes injuring the whales. That is called “level A harassment”.
To date NOAA has issued an astounding 46 one-year IHA’s for offshore wind sites. Site characterization typically includes the protracted use of what I call “machine gun sonar”. This shipboard device emits an incredibly loud noise several times a second, often for hours at a time, as the ship slowly maps the sea floor.
Mapping often takes many days to complete. A blaster can log hundreds of miles surveying a 10-by-10 mile site. Each IHA is typically for an entire year.
A list of the IHA’s issued to date and those applied for may be found here.
There are lots of ways this sonar blasting might cause whales to die. Simply fleeing the incredible noise could cause ship strikes or fish gear entanglements, the two leading causes of whale deaths. Of the whales could be deafened, increasing their chances of being struck by a ship later on. Direct bleeding injury, like getting their ears damaged, is another known risk, possibly leading to death from infection. So, there can be a big time difference between blasting and death.
Note also that these deaths need not be in the immediate vicinity of the sonar blasting, so spatial correlation is unlikely. Humpbacks in particular are prodigious travelers. One group was tracked traveling 3,000 miles in just 28 days, over 100 miles a day on average. Another group routinely migrates 5,000 miles. Both are winter-summer migrations which can happen twice a year.
Thus a sonar blasting, site characterization in one place could easily lead to multiple whale deaths hundreds of miles away. If one of these blasters suddenly goes off near a group of whales they might go off in different directions, then slowly die.
The point is that the huge 2016 jump in annual humpback mortality coincides with the huge jump in NOAA Incidental Harassment Authorizations. It is that simple and surely NOAA Fisheries knows this.
Nor is this just about humpbacks. Some of the dead whales off New Jersey are endangered sperm whales. And, of course, there are the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whales, on the verge of extinction.
Even worse, the IHA’s are about to make a much bigger jump. There are eleven pending IHA applications and eight of these are for actually constructing 8 different monster wind “farms”.
Driving the hundreds of enormous monopiles that hold up the turbine towers and blades will be far louder than the sonic blasters approved to date, especially with eight sites going at once. These construction sites range from Virginia to Massachusetts, with a concentration off New Jersey and New York.
For more on this noise see my earlier article here.
Clearly we need a moratorium on new Incidental Harassment Authorizations until the safety of the whales and other marine species can be assured. Hundreds of whales may have already been killed by offshore wind activities. The evidence is right there.
Editor’s Note: The details are important to this story because they indicate the official deception going on in the name of “green energy.” Incidental Harassment Authorizations (IHAs) are effective for up to one year, issued for a single project and authorize “take” by harassment only and cannot authorize lethal take. See the definition of “take” here and note that while NOAA and others tend to refer only to the harassment aspecting of the definition, “take” does encompass killing whales. Moreover, there are two types of harassment, as follows, and pay particular attention to the one for Level A Harassment (emphasis added):
Level A Harassment means any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild.
Level B Harassment means any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering but which does not have the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild.
Yes, Level A includes injuring whales, which obviously also encompasses killing whales. This brings us to the Revolution Wind off-shore wind project near Rhode Island, which recently put out this report on its expected Level A takes relating to that project. It says the following:
The Revolution Wind mitigation and monitoring plan includes proposed exclusion zone ranges to prevent Level A take. However, humpback whales are the only species where the exposure ranges (ER95%) exceed the proposed exclusion zones for large whales. Based on the proposed exclusion zone ranges as well as Revolution Wind’s commitment to implementation of mitigation measures (delayed starts, shutdowns etc.), Revolution Wind is proposing to ask for Level A take for this species.
And, Table 51 of the report summarizes, indicating that project is expected to involve eight (8) Level A takes of Humpbacks. So, injuring and, presumably, killing whales is almost certainly involved in these ludicrous off-shore wind projects, despite all the talk to the contrary by those who have sold their souls to “green energy” grifters.
David Wojick is an independent analyst specializing in science and logic in public policy. He also does confidential research and consulting. Article originally published by CFACT.
The post Killing Whales and Never Having to Say You’re Sorry! appeared first on Natural Gas Now. This post appeared first on Natural Gas Now.