BusinessCreator, Inc.

Anadarko May Trim Colorado Work If Proposition 112 Pass

Oil and gas producer Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: APC) said Oct. 31 it may shift some investment out of Colorado if voters in that state approve a ballot proposal that limits drilling in populated areas. The measure would put at least 85% of new oil and gas development on non-federal lands off limits to new drilling, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has said. Oil companies have raised tens of millions to oppose the measure. Anadarko could shift focus to properties in the Delaware Basin, which spans West Texas and New Mexico, if Colorado voters on Nov. 6 pass Proposition 112, a law requiring up to 2,500-ft separations between new wells and homes, schools and parks, executives said during an earnings conference call.
[

Wind Farms Cause Global Warming? Please, Say It Isn’t So

. … Could wind farms cause global warming, possibly even more than fossil fuels? A new Harvard University study suggests they could. A Harvard University study suggests that, under certain conditions and in the near term, increased wind power could mean more climate warming … Continue reading

The post Wind Farms Cause Global Warming? Please, Say It Isn’t So appeared first on Natural Gas Now.

Marketed: Texegy Louisiana Austin Chalk Core Mineral Interests

The following information is provided by Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc. All inquiries on the following listings should be directed to Houlihan Lokey. Hart Energy is not a brokerage firm and does not endorse or facilitate any transactions. Texegy LLC is offering for sale its oil and gas mineral and royalty interests located in Vernon and Sabine parishes in the core of the Louisiana Austin Chalk trend. Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc. has been retained by Texegy to serve as its exclusive financial adviser to assist with this transaction. Bids are due Dec. 5.
[

Four Pennsylvania Counties Can Supply All the Gas Germany Needs!

Tom Shepstone Shepstone Management Company, Inc. … … Four counties in Pennsylvania—Bradford, Greene, Susquehanna and Washington—can supply all the natural gas needed by Germany. It can give Russia the Heisman. My post the other day about the fact “Susquehanna County … Continue reading

The post Four Pennsylvania Counties Can Supply All the Gas Germany Needs! appeared first on Natural Gas Now.

New Study Challenges Claim that Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Are Higher than EPA Estimates

Earlier this year, headlines across the country blared an alarming finding: methane emissions from oil and gas could be 60 percent higher than what federal data suggest. Coverage from USA TODAY and Time, among many others, painted a picture of shale gas that was far different than what multiple scientific assessments have concluded.

But a new study, published today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), shows how the earlier finding of higher-than-expected methane leakage could itself be a result of how top-down aircraft measurements are extrapolated to annual averages. The research team was led by Dr. Timothy Vaughn at Colorado State University, who was joined by experts from the University of Colorado, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, among others.

The new research has implications for earlier studies that employed what’s known as top-down (TD) inventories, where scientists would fly over producing areas and record how much methane they encountered. Curiously, these types of studies have traditionally found higher emissions than those taking measurements on site, or so-called bottom-up (BU) inventories. Some researchers have suggested that TD inventories are capturing so-called “super-emitters” that cannot be captured in BU inventories. The study that alleged emissions were 60 percent higher than U.S. EPA data used TD measurements.

What today’s study shows, however, is that top-down measurements can significantly inflate methane emissions from oil and gas operations if they are assumed to occur continuously. One reason is because TD inventories often measure emissions during snapshots in time during the afternoon while routine maintenance activities are occurring. Maintenance typically only lasts a few hours, but TD inventories in the past have assumed the measurements are representative of operations all the time.

Dynamic Emissions

Methane emissions from oil and gas sites are dynamic and temporal. Measurements taken during flyovers typically occur in the late afternoon, which are often when emissions are “amplified” due to onsite maintenance activities. As a result, those measurements are not necessarily representative of the average emissions profile of a particular operation, much less an entire producing basin.

How do we know that? Because the researchers confirmed it in the study released today. As the study notes:

“Study area total emissions exhibited significant variability throughout the day. On both days of the study period, modeled emissions peaked during mid-afternoon hours due to MLUs performed and recorded by production facility operators.” (emphasis added)

To address this problem, the researchers took concurrent measurements on site in the Fayetteville basin in Arkansas while they were also taking flyover measurements. By comparing the top-down and bottom-up techniques during the same time, the researchers were able to complete a first-of-its-kind reconciliation.

In other words, top-down inventories performed without an accompanying understanding of bottom-up operations aren’t necessarily giving us an accurate picture of average emissions. Rather than confirming the existence of “super-emitters,” TD studies may suggest average emissions are far higher than they actually are. In the study published today, the researchers were able to largely close the gap between their TD and BU measurements by considering the timing of emissions events and not over-extrapolating the TD findings.

There is nothing, then, that requires the presence of “super-emitters” to explain higher emissions in top-down studies for this particular basin.

Getting an Accurate Picture

Today’s study benefited from concurrent onsite measurements, which were done in cooperation with several oil and gas companies operating in the basin. This is what allowed them to reconcile top-down and bottom-up measurements, and thus provide us with a clearer picture of methane emissions from oil and gas sites.

The key takeaway is that industry cooperation is critical to having scientifically valid results. As the researchers showed, top-down measurements may be capturing events that are temporary, particularly daily maintenance activities such as manual liquids unloadings. Not being able to compare those data against data obtained onsite was previously a major limitation of the results obtained during TD studies.  Prior TD researches have posed various theories for their higher emission findings; the authors of the paper released today designed a comprehensive, rigorous study to reconcile differences between TD and BU measurements, based on actual events and evidence.

It’s important to stress that today’s study doesn’t necessarily “debunk” prior research, although it does provide a reasonable explanation as to why top-down measurements show methane emissions to be higher than other findings. As a result, TD measurements should be assessed with care and caution, as they could very well be conveying an operational picture that does not exist.

Today’s study also provides strong evidence that similar reconciliations between TD and BU measurements need to occur in other basins to get a better handle on methane emissions.

Policy Implications

Are methane emissions higher than EPA estimates? A large body of research already corroborates EPA’s data, but there have been a handful of studies – often widely covered by the media – that have succeeded in sowing doubt about methane emissions. The study released today, however, may provide a scientific blueprint for studying methane in additional basins across the country.

In a dynamic operating environment where workers primarily work during the daytime, the timing of measurements matter.  As the authors note: “Careful consideration of all factors influencing methane emissions—including temporal variation—is necessary in scientific and policy discussions to develop effective strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from natural gas infrastructure.”

This study may also be useful in state and federal regulatory proceedings. If nothing else, what the researchers demonstrated is that the underlying assumptions and extrapolations of prior methane studies – especially those being used to guide public policy – need to be carefully scrutinized.

Commonwealth Court States Obvious: Allegheny Township Can Plan for Gas

Tom Shepstone Shepstone Management Company, Inc. … … Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court just decided a case in Allegheny Township, Westmoreland County, that strikes a blow for common sense in applying the law. The case has an impossibly long name, so I’ll just … Continue reading

The post Commonwealth Court States Obvious: Allegheny Township Can Plan for Gas appeared first on Natural Gas Now.

Two Charts Completely Undercut New York Times on Federal Oil and Gas Leasing

This weekend, Eric Lipton and a team of reporters from the New York Times published a lengthy story about federal leasing for oil and natural gas development in Wyoming, and how a recent uptick in development was “driven by” the Trump administration. The broader thesis is what you might expect: the Trump administration is working “hand in glove with the industry” to expand leasing on federal lands, particularly by rolling back costly rules, including ones finalized in the final weeks of the Obama administration. The Times relied on data from a group called Taxpayers for Common Sense, which has been an outspoken defender of controversial regulations targeting venting and flaring on federal lands.

However, easily obtained federal data completely undermine the Times‘ narrative, and it’s not even close.

The centerpiece of the story is a chart showing an increase in acreage offered during federal lease sales during the Trump administration. Lipton even tweeted out the chart, accusing the White House of being in a “race to lease more and more federal lands for oil and gas drilling.”

Seems pretty cut and dry, right? Wrong. This is a classic case of using deliberately misleading data to support what had to have been a predetermined conclusion.

The clever sleight of hand is Lipton’s use of land offered for lease, rather than acreage actually leased for development. If you’re suggesting there’s some sort of frenzy of new drilling, then focusing on where companies are actually drilling would be the more appropriate data to examine.

But those data completely contradict Lipton’s story.

Each year of President Obama’s first term, more federal acreage was leased for development than during the current administration. Don’t believe us? Here are the data, directly from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

But Lipton focused on Wyoming, and even reported on the ground from the Cowboy State. Perhaps the data for Wyoming support the Times‘ narrative? Nope.

The New York Times claims a surge in leasing on federal lands in Wyoming — which doesn’t exist — was “driven by Trump policy changes” that allegedly put certain birds and other species at risk. The available data simply do not corroborate this claim.

Natural Gas NOW Picks of the Week – October 27, 2018

Tom Shepstone Shepstone Management Company, Inc. … … Natural Gas NOW readers pass along a lot of stuff every week about natural gas, fractivist antics, emissions, renewables, and other news relating to energy. As usual, emphasis is added. Activists Blast Good … Continue reading

The post Natural Gas NOW Picks of the Week – October 27, 2018 appeared first on Natural Gas Now.

Northeast Supply Enhancement